- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-performing_loan
-
Worldwide, the most common and successful approach towards NPL management is the establishment of Asset Management Companies (AMC).
- Corporate Governance
- Better credit information to cut down on fresh NPLs
- Prudential Supervision
- Efficient, capable management
- Well developed capital markets that can offer the mechanism and liquidity required to write off bad loans
- Securitization
-
These companies use public or bank funds to remove NPAs from the bank books.
-
For example, the Korea Asset Management Corporation purchased as much as 80% of bad loans at market rate following the Asian crises. Now, there are several proactive measures that are being implemented:
-
FROM THE START:
-
HOW A LOAN IS GRANTED,UNDER WHAT TERMS AND CONDITIONS?
-
FOR HOW LONG THE LOAN IS GRANTED?
-
WHO WERE ALL INVOLVED IN THE PREPARATION,FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDIES, PROPERLY SUPERVISED BY OFFICERS IN PERSON, WHO ALL APPROVED THIS PARTICULAR LOAN.
-
HAVE THE LOANS BEEN GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH AND WITHOUT NEGLIGENCE????
-
DID THE OFFICIALS PRACTISED ANY BACK DOOR TACTICS?
-
THE BANK MANAGERS, THE OFFICERS, THE PEOPLE WHO PREPARED THE FEASIBILITY STUDIES(FOR THE SAKE OF PERSONAL GAINS) ALL TO BE TAKEN TO TASK AND THEIR PERSONAL ASSETS ARE TO BE INVESTIGATED.
-
EVEN THE CONTINUOUS REGULAR AUDITORS ARE TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NPA.
-
LOANS WHEN DISBURSED THE FOLLOW UPS IN THE PROPER WAY AT REGULAR INTERVALS WHETHER IT HAS BEEN DONE MUST BE IN WRITING AND WITH THE PERSONS WHO FOLLOWED UP.
-
WHAT RIGHTFUL ACTION IS TAKEN MUST BE REPORTED TO A FINAL AUTHORITY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THEY ARE NOW.?
-
DEPOSITORS MONEY AND SHAREHOLDERS MONEY IS AT STAKE BY THE CARELESS AND NEGLIGENT MANAGEMENT.
-
WHY FROM THE START THIS IS NOT PROPERLY DONE?
-
WHO HAS TO ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY???
-
THE GAME IS PLAYED. THE BALL IS PASSED FROM ONE TO ANOTHER.
-
THERE IS NO ONUS OR LIABILITY ON THE PART OF THE SANCTIONED OFFICIALS.
-
CHECK ALL THE PERSONAL ASSETS OF THE BANK MANAGERS WHO SANCTIONED THESE LOANS.
-
SINCERITY AND INTEGRITY IS ALSO QUESTIONABLE OF THE PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE INCREASING OF THE NPA.
-
WHAT IS THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF NPA OF THE BANKS PORTFOLIO( ALL BANKS REPORT)?
-
- WHY HAVE THEY BECOME SUBSTANDARD???
- WHY HAVE THEY BECOME DOUBTFUL??
- WHO WERE ALL RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE KIND OF
- SITUATIONS?
- IF ALL THE NECESSARY AND CARE AND ATTENTION
- HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO COLLECT AND FOR VALID
- REASONS THE LOAN COULD NOT BE COLLECTED
- THEN THAT CAN BE ACCEPTABLE.
- IF THE LOAN WAS RS. 100000 AND RS.10000 DUE MAY BE
- ACCEPTED AS BAD AND CAN BE WRITTEN OFF.
Worldwide, the most common and successful approach towards NPL management is the establishment of Asset Management Companies (AMC).
- Corporate Governance
- Better credit information to cut down on fresh NPLs
- Prudential Supervision
- Efficient, capable management
- Well developed capital markets that can offer the mechanism and liquidity required to write off bad loans
- Securitization
These companies use public or bank funds to remove NPAs from the bank books.
For example, the Korea Asset Management Corporation purchased as much as 80% of bad loans at market rate following the Asian crises. Now, there are several proactive measures that are being implemented:
FROM THE START:
HOW A LOAN IS GRANTED,UNDER WHAT TERMS AND CONDITIONS?
FOR HOW LONG THE LOAN IS GRANTED?
WHO WERE ALL INVOLVED IN THE PREPARATION,FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDIES, PROPERLY SUPERVISED BY OFFICERS IN PERSON, WHO ALL APPROVED THIS PARTICULAR LOAN.
HAVE THE LOANS BEEN GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH AND WITHOUT NEGLIGENCE????
DID THE OFFICIALS PRACTISED ANY BACK DOOR TACTICS?
THE BANK MANAGERS, THE OFFICERS, THE PEOPLE WHO PREPARED THE FEASIBILITY STUDIES(FOR THE SAKE OF PERSONAL GAINS) ALL TO BE TAKEN TO TASK AND THEIR PERSONAL ASSETS ARE TO BE INVESTIGATED.
EVEN THE CONTINUOUS REGULAR AUDITORS ARE TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NPA.
LOANS WHEN DISBURSED THE FOLLOW UPS IN THE PROPER WAY AT REGULAR INTERVALS WHETHER IT HAS BEEN DONE MUST BE IN WRITING AND WITH THE PERSONS WHO FOLLOWED UP.
WHAT RIGHTFUL ACTION IS TAKEN MUST BE REPORTED TO A FINAL AUTHORITY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THEY ARE NOW.?
DEPOSITORS MONEY AND SHAREHOLDERS MONEY IS AT STAKE BY THE CARELESS AND NEGLIGENT MANAGEMENT.
WHY FROM THE START THIS IS NOT PROPERLY DONE?
WHO HAS TO ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY???
THE GAME IS PLAYED. THE BALL IS PASSED FROM ONE TO ANOTHER.
THERE IS NO ONUS OR LIABILITY ON THE PART OF THE SANCTIONED OFFICIALS.
CHECK ALL THE PERSONAL ASSETS OF THE BANK MANAGERS WHO SANCTIONED THESE LOANS.
SINCERITY AND INTEGRITY IS ALSO QUESTIONABLE OF THE PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE INCREASING OF THE NPA.
WHAT IS THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF NPA OF THE BANKS PORTFOLIO( ALL BANKS REPORT)?
No comments:
Post a Comment